The drive to place women in combat is not an advance of civilization but a mark of its decay. It reveals a society that no longer knows what a woman is, what a man is, or why those differences once mattered. The story begins in 1978, when female sailors sued the U.S. Navy for the “right” to serve aboard ships during deployment. A federal judge, bowing to the new orthodoxy of gender equality, ruled in their favor. The Navy complied, assigning women to a repair ship called the Vulcan. Within weeks, sailors nicknamed it The Love Boat. The Navy had warned that cohabiting men and women in close quarters under stress would lead to predictable results—pregnancy, jealousy, and disruption of discipline. Before the Vulcan even left port, three women were pregnant.
This was hailed as progress. But progress toward what? The military had not been strengthened; the moral order had been mocked. What had once been self-evident—that the armed forces are no place for sexual tension or romantic drama—was replaced by a naïve faith that bureaucratic rules could erase human nature. The Love Boat became a floating symbol of our confusion: a warship reimagined as a social experiment.
A decade later, Captain Linda Bray was thrust into the spotlight as the first woman to “lead men in combat” during the 1989 invasion of Panama. Newspapers trumpeted her supposed heroism, claiming she had guided her troops through a three-hour firefight. The truth, soon exposed, was that Bray had been far from the fighting. The legend was a political invention—propaganda meant to sell the illusion that men and women are interchangeable in war. The reality was more sobering: Bray’s military career ended when she shattered her legs under the weight of gear that her body simply could not carry.
These two episodes—the Love Boat and Linda Bray—stand as parables of modern folly. They reveal how ideology has triumphed over truth, and how a society drunk on slogans like “equality” and “empowerment” has lost the ability to distinguish virtue from vanity. The question is not whether women can fight, but whether they should. In every civilization before ours, the answer was obvious: men go to war so that women and children do not have to. That is not oppression; it is sacrifice. It is chivalry.
By sending women into combat, we do not elevate them—we degrade them. We turn mothers and daughters into instruments of violence. We strip away the protective instinct that once defined manhood and the dignity that once defined womanhood. We treat the sexes as rivals rather than as partners. In the name of “equality,” we have created confusion, resentment, and weakness—both in the ranks and in the culture.
The moral cost is immense. A civilization that asks women to fight its wars has already surrendered the very thing worth fighting for: the distinction between protector and protected, between giver and guardian of life. When men no longer see it as their duty to shield women, and women no longer wish to be shielded, society has ceased to understand itself. The Love Boat was not just a ship—it was a warning. And Linda Bray’s tragedy was not just personal—it was prophetic.
We have mistaken sameness for justice, and in doing so, we have traded honor for ideology. A nation that sends its daughters into battle proclaims, not its strength, but its desperation.
TPC Pastor's Page 