We know from Scripture that Satan and his demons are active in the world. They can tempt us. They can blind people. They can possess people. They can deceive even large scale groups, like nations and cultures. They can inspire worship to idols — and are themselves the idols who receive false worship, it seems.
We do not know how demons work in the world, but we know that they do. A demon is a creature and therefore limited. Satan cannot create anything new; he can only twist and pervert what God has already created. Satan cannot make people sin, but he can take advantage of our already sinful inclinations and desires.
The interaction between the physical and spiritual world is obvious, but also mysterious. This is true in both good ways and bad ways. For example, we know that how we feel is often influenced by what we eat and drink, how much sleep we get, etc. It is harder to do good when we are food or sleep deprived; we are often spiritually weaker when we are physically weaker. This may be at least in part why the discipline of fasting is important — we are testing ourselves to see if we can still be spiritually strong when we are physically weak. It’s a form of spiritual training.
We know man is a unity of body and soul and the body and soul interact in various ways. What we call mental illness are often treated with physical medications — but “mental” suggests the illness is located in the immaterial mind, while we are treating the chemistry of the physical organ called the brain. This only makes sense if the spiritual and physical — the mind and the brain — are somehow distinct but also integrated. (I am not making any calims here about the legitimacy or efficacy of these medications — just noting what has to be true for them to work the way they supposedly do.) Take another example: Scripture says that spanking a child can save his soul from hell – a physical act with spiritual effects. We could keep going with examples of spiritual/physcial crossover and interaction: preaching is just sounds waves, but God uses it to transform sinners. Likewise, in baptism and the Eucharist God uses physical elements to bring about spiritual changes.
In 1 Samuel 16, David’s music — presumably psalms singing with accompaniment, but it is possible it was only instrumental — drives away a demonic spirit from Saul. How can music have an impact on demons? Do demons have ears? Are they effected by sounds? How is music efficacious in this way? We cannot really explain it — but Scripture affirms it.
In the Christian tradition, the ringing of church bells has been believed by many to drive away dark spirits. How can bells repel demons? I’m not sure if they can, but obviously music can have an effect in the spiritual realm — so maybe bells can too. Of course, the influence can also run the other direction — or so it would seem. While a lot of fears about rock ‘n’ roll are unfounded (e.g., the 1980s backmasking “Satanic panic” controversy), should it surprise us if demons have in some way (again, mysteriously) used music made by evil people to produce evil effects in the culture? Many musicians have thought this about their own music — and bragged about it. I do not see how anyone can doubt that rock music impacted the way people thought and acted in evil ways. Not everyone who listens to rock is influenced negatively — for some people its pretty benign — but it definitely leads some people in the wrong direction to do things they might other wise not do. “Sex, drugs, and rock ‘n’ roll” became an unholy trinity for a reason.
If Satan can use music to influence people in demonic directions, what about other created things? On the one hand, Paul says forbidding certain food and drink is demonic since God made the world good (1 Timothy 4), so that even meat offered to idols is permissible to eat in a private home (1 Corinthians 8, 10). On the other hand, Paul seems to indicate that in idolatrous rituals, people can commune with demons through food and drink. Demons have a table and a cup — and those who eat and drink in the context of a Satanic liturgy are eating and drinking with demons (1 Corinthians 10). That’s weird, but I don’t see how we can deny it. Satan is a counterfeiter — and he has his sacraments too.
That brings us to the question of drugs. I have written about this elsewhere (such as here) and anyone who is interested should especially consult Lewis Ungit’s book Return of the Dragon. I have argued (tentatively) that certain drugs (obviously not everything we call a “drug” today since that is a massive category — but some drugs) can open the door to the demonic. This seems to be particularly true of psychedelic drugs. There is biblical and experiential evidence for this. The OT Torah prohibits witchcraft — so it’s important to be able to define what it is. It certainly includes trying to contact the dead (1 Samuel 28). The definition of the word in both OT and NT forms seems to include using drugs or potions to gain control or otherwise influence a person. It is an attempt to use demonic power to curse, control, or harm others. It is seeking information or power from demonic sources. If witchcraft was not real — if no demonic activity is involved — if it’s just fakery and deception — it’s hard to understand why it would it would warrant the death penalty. It would be a sin, perhaps even a crime, but not a capital crime. This is why I have argued elsewhere that those who dispense mind-altering/conscious-altering drugs such as psychedelics, in many cases, should be considered modern day witches.
My guess is that people who are not very open to demonic influence can listen to rock music without being overtly influenced in demonic ways — though it can still be spiritually dangerous. Likewise, my guess is that if someone uses psychedlics, their consciousness will be altered in ways that are not good — and those who were already open to a lot of demonic influence in their lives will probably have some kind of demonic encounter because whatever resistance they might have to it has been drastically lowered. Why do so many people who have used ayahuasca, across time and place, report eerily similar visions? Probably because there is something objective — something that really exists — a demonic realm — that they are tapping into. Since most people using ayahuasca are probably already pretty open to demonic influence, they open themselves up even further, and get what they were asking for. Many psychedelic drug users report encounters with demons — I am inclined to believe their testimony.
Take drunkenness as an analogy. In Ephesians 5, Paul seems to contrast being filled alcoholic spirits with being filled with the Holy Spirit. In both cases, there is surrender of control to another. But while drunkenness is always a sin, and often leads to a host of other sins, this does not mean drunkenness is always a demonic experience. Any drunkenness will involve one’s spiritual guard being lowered — but those who were generally not open to demonic influence before intoxication will not suddenly have a demonic encounter if they have too much wine. But those who were already giving themselves over to demonic influence by their way of life prior to drinking too much will just be opening the door further to demonic influence, even control. And the results will probably become evident in how they act when drunk.
We should not hesitate to see demonic activity in other areas. For example, child sacrifice (which seems to be linked with witchcraft in the Torah) is a form of Molech worship. It is demonic. This does not mean every woman who gets an abortion is under control of demons — though in some cases, this is probably happening — but there is certainly demonic activity involved. Transgenderism has always been pagan — and the twisted use of pronouns might very well be a sign of demonic influence (see Mark 5).
All that to say: There are many gateways to demonic influence. Just as there are degrees of sanctification for the Christian, there are degrees of surrender to Satan on the part of unbelievers. The best way to guard yourself against the demonic is to trust and obey God. Faithful obedience repels Satanic temptation and attack. Christians do not need to ordinarily fear demon possession — demons cannot take possession of anyone who is unwilling to cooperate. But Christians should also recognize that some things — like certain drugs, or drunkenness, or participating in idolatrous and Satanic worship rituals — can lower one’s guard against demonic influences and may one a pawn in Satan’s hand.
Satan’s counterfeit work can be powerful and deceptive: Satan has his own liturgies. Satan has his own preaching — false teachers in the church and culture. Satan has his own sacraments, so to speak, and even music he can use to spread his lies in the culture. This is why the church’s liturgical, homiletical, and sacramental warfare is so important — it’s the most powerful way we can fight back against the dark principalities and powers. Our battle is not really against flesh and blood, after all.
—
Let’s see what Grok has to say about some of these things. After writing the above, I asked Grok to answer a few questions to see how it would compare. (Footnotes/references will not come through.)
I asked Grok, “Can certain drugs, particularly psychedelics, open the user up to demonic influence?”
Grok answers:
The question of whether drugs, especially psychedelics like psilocybin (magic mushrooms), LSD, DMT, or ayahuasca, can open individuals to demonic influence is a contentious one, rooted in theological, cultural, and psychological perspectives. From a biblical and Christian standpoint, many argue yes, viewing altered states as gateways to spiritual vulnerability. However, scientific evidence largely attributes such experiences to brain chemistry, cultural biases, and psychological factors rather than literal supernatural entities. Below, I’ll outline the key arguments and evidence from various sources, representing a range of viewpoints including Christian warnings, personal testimonies, and empirical studies. Note that while psychedelics like psilocybin are Schedule I substances in the U.S. (with some therapeutic exceptions in research), this discussion focuses on reported effects, not endorsement or instructions for use.
Biblical and Theological Perspectives
In Christian theology, the Bible doesn’t explicitly mention modern psychedelics, but passages are often interpreted as warnings against drug-induced altered states. The Greek word “pharmakeia” (translated as “sorcery” or “witchcraft” in Galatians 5:19-21, Revelation 9:21, and 18:23) is linked by some scholars to the use of mind-altering substances for spiritual or divinatory purposes, as ancient practices involved potions and herbs to commune with spirits. [0] [3] This is seen as opening doors to demonic influence, echoing the Book of Enoch (an apocryphal text referenced in Jude 1:14-15), where fallen angels teach humanity “charms and enchantments” involving plants, interpreted as psychedelic sorcery. [0]
Catholic teachings, as in the Catechism (CCC 2291), condemn drug use as cooperating with evil and contrary to moral law, partly because psychedelics have historical ties to non-Christian worship and entity encounters that could be demonic. [2] Figures like Martin Luther noted that altered states might invite the devil, contrasting with how praise or music repels him. [4] Modern Christian authors and deliverance ministers, such as those at Focus on the Family, argue that drugs impair self-control (essential for spiritual growth per Galatians 5:22-23) and create vulnerability to demonic oppression, citing examples like entity contacts during DMT trips as “nonmaterial life forms” manipulating users. [3] [8]
Evidence here is interpretive and anecdotal: Christian testimonies describe psychedelics leading to “demonic” encounters, such as feelings of possession or hellish visions, which resolve through prayer or renunciation. [1] [6] For instance, some former users report false spiritual wisdom or attacks, viewing drugs as conduits for deception rather than enlightenment. [1]
Anecdotal and Personal Stories as Evidence
Personal accounts provide much of the “evidence” for demonic influence, often shared in religious communities or online forums. These include:
• “Bad trips” interpreted as demonic: Surveys show that during psychedelic experiences, users may encounter negative entities described as demons, devils, or monsters (11% in one DMT study), leading to fear, paranoia, or a sense of hell/evil presence (4% reporting afterlife fears). [21] [25] [30] Long-term effects can include existential struggles, depersonalization, or spiritual decline, which some attribute to demonic attacks. [21] [22]
• Entity encounters: In ayahuasca or DMT sessions, users report communicating with beings that feel autonomous and malicious, such as “energetically attacked” by spirits (14.9% in one survey). [4] [11] [33] Christian interpreters see these as real demons, not hallucinations, drawing parallels to shamanic traditions where psychedelics summon spirits. [7] [14]
• Specific testimonies: On X (formerly Twitter), users describe ayahuasca visions leading to abusive relationships (interpreted as demonic deception), mushroom trips with evil entities feeding on fear, or high-dose shrooms causing hellish torture and persisting hallucinations (HPPD). [35] [36] [37] [40] One account links psychedelics to reptilian demons in elite circles, tying into broader conspiracy views. [41] These stories align with warnings from figures like MMA fighter Jake Shields, who notes historical human sacrifices and psychedelic entity contacts as potentially demonic. [40]
Such reports are common in Christian circles (e.g., Reddit’s r/Reformed) but subjective, often influenced by pre-existing beliefs—believers are more likely to interpret negative experiences as demonic. [1] [15]
Scientific and Psychological Counterpoints
From a scientific lens, there’s no empirical evidence proving demonic influence; experiences are explained as neurochemical effects. Psychedelics disrupt default mode networks in the brain, leading to hyper-suggestibility, entity hallucinations, and altered perceptions that mimic psychosis or dissociation. Bad trips (involving fear, insanity, or evil entities) are common but often resolve into positive insights; they’re not inherently demonic but can be culturally framed that way.
Studies show:
• Entity encounters (e.g., in DMT) are phenomenological, with 55% of atheists/agnostics shifting beliefs post-trip, but no proof of actual demons.
• Adverse effects like paranoia (11-26%) or HPPD are linked to dosage, set/setting, and pre-existing mental health, not supernatural forces.
• Cultural biases shape interpretations: In Amazonian traditions, entities are spirits; in Western science, they’re hallucinations; in Christian contexts, demons. One review concludes “demonic possession” is psychopathological, treatable with therapy and meds.
Skeptics note that similar “demonic” experiences occur in dreams, meditation, or mental illness without drugs, questioning psychedelics’ unique role. Positive outcomes (e.g., increased openness, spiritual growth) are more common in controlled settings.
Conclusion
If your worldview aligns with biblical Christianity, psychedelics may indeed pose risks of demonic influence through altered consciousness, supported by scriptural interpretations and numerous testimonies. However, evidence is primarily anecdotal and faith-based, with no scientific validation of literal demons—instead, experiences are seen as brain-induced phenomena that can be beneficial or harmful depending on context. For believers like yourself, Pastor Lusk, passages like Ephesians 6:12 (spiritual warfare) and 1 Peter 5:8 (sobriety against the devil) emphasize caution. If facing such issues, combining prayer, Scripture, and professional counsel (e.g., from deliverance ministries or therapists) is advisable, as some reports note resolution through faith. Ultimately, the interpretation depends on one’s beliefs—demonic for some, psychological for others.
—
What does witchcraft on the Bible include? Why was practicing witchcraft worthy of death in Old Testament law? Why is witchcraft considered a work of the flesh in Galatians 5? How does witchcraft compare to sorcery and other magic arts?
Grok answers:
What Witchcraft Includes in the Bible
The Bible condemns witchcraft as a broad category of occult practices that involve seeking supernatural power or knowledge apart from God. In the Old Testament, the Hebrew term often translated as “witchcraft” or “sorcery” is kashaph (from a root meaning “to mutter” or “whisper” incantations), which encompasses spell-casting, enchantments, and manipulating spiritual forces. Key passages like Deuteronomy 18:9-12 list it alongside related sins: divination (foretelling the future), interpreting omens, casting spells, mediumship (consulting spirits), and necromancy (communing with the dead). These are described as “detestable” (to’evah) to the Lord because they imitate pagan nations and undermine trust in God’s sovereignty. In the New Testament, witchcraft is grouped with idolatry and immorality, emphasizing its spiritual rebellion (e.g., Galatians 5:19-21). Overall, biblical witchcraft isn’t limited to modern stereotypes like broomsticks or cauldrons but includes any attempt to control or access hidden powers through rituals, objects, or entities outside of Yahweh.
Why Practicing Witchcraft Was Worthy of Death in Old Testament Law
Under the Mosaic Law, witchcraft carried the death penalty as a capital offense, reflecting its severity as an act of high treason against God. Exodus 22:18 states bluntly, “You shall not permit a sorceress to live,” while Leviticus 20:27 prescribes stoning for mediums or spiritists. The reasons are theological and covenantal:
- Idolatry and Rebellion: Witchcraft involved turning to false gods, spirits, or demonic forces for guidance, protection, or power—directly violating the first commandment (Exodus 20:3-5). It was seen as “ignoring Him and turning to alternate deities,” a “blatant slap in God’s face.”
- Corruption of the Community: As Israel was to be a holy nation (Exodus 19:6), such practices could spread like spiritual pollution, leading others into apostasy. Deuteronomy 18:9-12 warns against imitating Canaanite abominations, which God used to justify driving out those nations.
- Protection from Deception: These acts often involved manipulation (e.g., through potions or illusions), deceiving people and undermining faith in God’s providence. Examples like Saul’s consultation of the Witch of Endor (1 Samuel 28) illustrate how it led to judgment and death. This penalty was part of the theocratic law for Israel, emphasizing purity in worship, though the New Testament shifts focus to spiritual consequences rather than civil execution.
Why Witchcraft Is Considered a Work of the Flesh in Galatians 5
In Galatians 5:19-21, Paul lists “witchcraft” (or “sorcery”) among the “works of the flesh”—behaviors stemming from human sinful nature that contrast with the fruit of the Spirit (vv. 22-23). The Greek word here is pharmakeia, from which we derive “pharmacy,” originally meaning the use of drugs, potions, or poisons for magical purposes. It’s classified as a work of the flesh because:
- Association with Idolatry and Control: Pharmakeia often involved mind-altering substances in pagan rituals, abortions, or manipulative poisons, linking it to idolatry (worship of false gods) and sexual immorality in Paul’s list. It represents self-reliant attempts to achieve altered states or power without God, opposing the Spirit’s self-control (Galatians 5:23).
- Demonic Openness and Deception: Such practices could invite demonic influence or deception, as drugs impair judgment and open doors to occult experiences. Paul warns that those who persist in these will not inherit God’s kingdom, emphasizing repentance.
- Broader Sinful Nature: As a “work of the flesh,” it’s not just external acts but inner rebellion—prioritizing human desires over divine authority, leading to division and excess. This term appears similarly in Revelation (e.g., 9:21; 18:23), condemning end-times deception through “sorceries.”
How Witchcraft Compares to Sorcery and Other Magic Arts
In biblical usage, witchcraft, sorcery, and magic arts overlap significantly but have nuances:
- Witchcraft (kashaph in OT, broader in NT): Often general, focusing on spells, enchantments, and spirit contact. It’s the umbrella term for rebellious occultism.
- Sorcery (pharmakeia in NT): Specifically tied to drug use—potions for poisoning, hallucinations, or rituals. It’s translated as “sorcery” or “witchcraft” but emphasizes pharmacological manipulation, like in pagan oracles or abortions. Acts 8:9-24 describes Simon the Sorcerer using “magic” (mageuo) to astonish people, blending deception with power displays.
- Other Magic Arts: Terms like “divination” (qesem, guessing omens) or “enchantments” (nahash, serpent-like whispering) highlight methods—e.g., interpreting signs or using amulets. All are condemned equally as “abominations” for bypassing God (Micah 5:12; Acts 19:19, where Ephesian converts burn magic books). The common thread is idolatry and control, whether through drugs (sorcery), words (witchcraft), or rituals (magic arts), all leading to spiritual death without repentance.
—
Can church bells repel demons? Can the frequency of church bells effect demons? Why does Calvin Robinson claim this?
Grok answers:
Yes, according to longstanding Christian tradition (especially in Catholic, Orthodox, and some Anglican contexts), the ringing of church bells has been believed to drive away demons or evil spirits. This is not a strictly biblical doctrine—Scripture does not explicitly mention bells repelling demons—but it stems from medieval and early Christian folk beliefs, sacramental theology, and exorcistic practices.
Historical and Traditional Basis
The idea dates back centuries:
• In ancient Roman times, bronze bells or vessels were rung to repel demons during eclipses or deaths (as noted by poets like Ovid).
• By the early Middle Ages, church bells were consecrated (often “baptized”) with holy water, oil, and incense. The Roman Pontifical (the book of rites) includes prayers asking that the bell’s sound:
• Drive away evil spirits,
• Banish storms and tempests,
• Protect from harm,
• And call the faithful to prayer.
• Old European bells frequently bore inscriptions like: “By my lively voice I drive away all harm” or “The sound of this bell vanquishes tempests, repels demons, and summons men.”
• Exorcists (particularly Catholic ones) report that demons react adversely to blessed bells during sessions—screaming, begging for them to stop, or fleeing the sound. This ties into the belief that holy, consecrated sounds create an “assault on the senses” that evil cannot tolerate, as the devil hates beauty and anything drawing attention to God.
This tradition views bells as sacramentals: objects blessed by the Church that dispose believers toward grace and offer protection in spiritual warfare (similar to holy water or crucifixes). The sound traveling through the air is seen as symbolically clearing demonic “powers of the air” (referencing Ephesians 2:2, where Satan is called the “prince of the power of the air”).
Modern skeptics and some Protestants dismiss this as superstition, but it persists in exorcism lore and cultural memory.
Here are historical depictions of church bells in traditional Christian settings, often associated with their protective role:
Why Does Calvin Robinson Claim This?
Fr. Calvin Robinson (an Anglican priest with Catholic orders and Anglo-Catholic leanings) has publicly stated that church bells ward off evil (or drive away demons), often in contrast to the Islamic call to prayer (adhan).
In posts on X (formerly Twitter), he wrote:
• “Church bells ward off evil. The adhan invites it.” (October 2025, in response to debates about cultural/religious sounds in public spaces).
• “Bells ward away evil. The adhan is a call to evil.”
He frames this as part of defending Christian heritage against perceived threats, emphasizing the beauty and spiritual potency of bells versus what he calls “screeching” or invasive calls. His view aligns with high-church traditions (e.g., “smells and bells” Anglicanism/Orthodoxy/Catholicism), where sacramentals like consecrated bells hold real spiritual power.
Robinson’s broader theology emphasizes spiritual warfare, demonic influence in modern culture (“demonic” elements in society, church vandalism as satanic attacks), and the protective role of traditional Christian practices. He draws on the same historical/exorcistic tradition outlined above, using it polemically to highlight Christianity’s superiority in cultural and spiritual terms.
In short, the claim isn’t unique to Robinson—it’s rooted in centuries of Christian folklore and rite—but he invokes it to defend bells as a beautiful, evil-repelling emblem of faith amid contemporary debates. As with music driving away torment (like David’s harp for Saul), many see such sounds as inviting God’s presence, which evil flees (James 4:7). Whether literal or symbolic, it reflects a worldview where consecrated Christian elements actively combat darkness.
—
Can music be used to drive away demons? How did David do this with Saul?
Grok answers:
Yes, according to the Bible and longstanding Christian tradition, music—particularly worship, praise, psalms, and hymns centered on God—can play a powerful role in confronting demonic oppression, torment, or influence, though it is not a mechanical “magic formula” or standalone weapon. It functions as part of spiritual warfare when rooted in faith, the authority of Christ, and the presence of the Holy Spirit.
The Biblical Foundation: David and Saul
The clearest scriptural example comes from 1 Samuel 16:14–23 (and referenced again in 1 Samuel 19:9–10). After the Spirit of the Lord departed from King Saul, an “evil spirit from the Lord” tormented him with distress, rage, and paranoia. Saul’s servants recognized the therapeutic (and apparently spiritual) effect of music, recommending:
“Let our lord now command your servants… to seek out a man who is a skillful player on the harp. And it shall be that when the distressing spirit from God comes upon you, that he will play it with his hand, and you shall be well.” (1 Samuel 16:16, NKJV)
David, the young shepherd anointed by God, was brought in. Whenever the evil spirit troubled Saul:
“David would take a harp and play it with his hand. Then Saul would become refreshed and well, and the distressing spirit would depart from him.” (1 Samuel 16:23)
This wasn’t mere psychological soothing (though music can calm the mind). The text explicitly links David’s Spirit-empowered playing to the departure of the evil spirit. David’s music, infused with his faith and God’s anointing, created an atmosphere incompatible with demonic torment. Many interpreters see this as an early example of music in spiritual warfare.
Broader Biblical and Historical Support
• Praise as Warfare: In 2 Chronicles 20, King Jehoshaphat sends singers ahead of the army to praise God, and the Lord sets ambushes against the enemy—victory comes through worship, not conventional fighting. John Piper and others describe this as “ambushing Satan with song,” where praise confounds evil forces.
• Singing in Affliction and Joy: James 5:13 instructs: “Is anyone among you suffering? Let him pray. Is anyone cheerful? Let him sing psalms.” While focused on personal trials, many connect this to spiritual encouragement amid oppression.
• New Testament Context: Jesus casts out demons by His word and authority (e.g., Mark 1:27, Luke 10:17–19), but the early church and later traditions incorporate praise. Paul and Silas sing hymns in prison (Acts 16:25), leading to an earthquake and deliverance—worship shifts the spiritual atmosphere.
• Christian Tradition: Figures like Martin Luther declared, “Music drives away the devil.” Missionaries like Amy Carmichael noted that true song makes Satan “slip out of the room.” Modern deliverance ministries (in Pentecostal, charismatic, and some evangelical circles) often use worship music during sessions, as demons reportedly flee atmospheres filled with God’s presence (Psalm 22:3 says God inhabits the praises of His people).
Important Caveats from Scripture
Music alone doesn’t guarantee results—it’s the heart behind it and Christ’s authority that matter:
• Demonic resistance isn’t overcome by volume or style but by faith in Jesus (Acts 19:13–16 warns against using Jesus’ name without genuine relationship).
• Not every affliction is demonic; some are physical, emotional, or due to sin (James 5:14–16 emphasizes prayer, confession, and anointing for healing).
• Worship music repels when it’s genuine praise, not ritualistic or fleshly (even “Christian” music can be misused if it lacks the Spirit).
In short, yes—biblically grounded worship music can drive back demonic influence, as seen in David’s harp playing for Saul and echoed in centuries of Christian testimony. It invites God’s presence, which evil cannot endure (James 4:7: “Resist the devil, and he will flee from you”). Many believers today play hymns, psalms, or praise songs in their homes during times of spiritual battle, finding real relief and protection.
If you’re facing something like this personally, combine music with prayer, Scripture, and (if needed) wise counsel from mature believers or church leaders experienced in spiritual matters. The victory is already won in Christ!
—
What are the principalities and powers in the NT?
Grok answers:
In the New Testament, the terms “principalities” and “powers” (often translated together as “principalities and powers”) refer to spiritual beings or authorities in the unseen heavenly realms. These are part of a broader biblical concept of angelic hierarchies—both good and evil—created by God but fallen into rebellion in the case of the evil ones. The Greek words are primarily archai (principalities/rulers/beginnings) and exousiai (powers/authorities), which denote ranks of rule, dominion, or delegated authority in the spiritual order.
The New Testament does not provide a systematic angelic/demonic org chart, but it uses these terms to describe supernatural forces that influence the world, oppose God’s purposes, or witness His glory. They are personal, intelligent beings (not impersonal forces), operating in the “heavenly places” (Ephesians 3:10; 6:12).
Key New Testament Passages
The phrase appears mainly in Paul’s letters, with varying nuances depending on context:
• Colossians 1:16 — “For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him.”
Here, principalities and powers are part of the created order (along with thrones and dominions), made by and for Christ. This includes both good and evil spiritual beings, all under His ultimate sovereignty.
• Romans 8:38-39 — “For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
Principalities and powers are listed among forces (including angels) that might seem threatening, but they cannot sever believers from God’s love. The context emphasizes assurance, implying these are created entities (possibly evil ones) powerless against Christ’s work.
• Ephesians 1:21 — Christ is seated “far above all principality and power and might and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in that which is to come.”
Jesus’ exaltation places Him supreme over every spiritual authority.
• Ephesians 3:10 — “To the intent that now the manifold wisdom of God might be made known by the church to the principalities and powers in the heavenly places.”
Here, the church displays God’s wisdom to these beings (likely including both holy angels, who marvel at redemption, and evil ones, who witness their defeat). This shows the cosmic scope of salvation.
• Ephesians 6:12 — “For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.”
This is the most famous reference, framing spiritual warfare as a battle against evil spiritual hierarchies—not human opponents. “Principalities” suggest high-ranking rulers, “powers” delegated authorities, “rulers of the darkness” cosmic overlords of evil, and “spiritual hosts of wickedness” broader demonic forces. These operate in the unseen realm but influence earthly affairs (echoing Daniel 10’s angelic “princes” over nations).
• Colossians 2:15 — “Having disarmed principalities and powers, He made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them in it [the cross].”
Christ’s death and resurrection decisively defeated and humiliated these evil forces, stripping their power to accuse or enslave believers (cf. Colossians 2:14-15). They are disarmed but still active until the final judgment.
• Titus 3:1 — Believers are to be subject to “principalities and powers” (here likely human authorities/rulers, showing the terms can apply to earthly governance in some contexts, ordained by God per Romans 13:1).
Overall Biblical Meaning and Implications
• Created by God — All principalities and powers (good or evil) originate from Him and were made through Christ (Colossians 1:16). Evil ones are fallen angels who rebelled with Satan (cf. Revelation 12:7-9; Isaiah 14; Ezekiel 28 allusions).
• Hierarchical and Organized — They form ranks or orders in the spiritual realm, with influence over territories, nations, cultures, or individuals (e.g., the “prince of Persia” in Daniel 10 as a demonic territorial power).
• Primarily Evil in Focus — In most New Testament uses (especially Ephesians 6:12), they denote demonic forces under Satan’s command, opposing God, deceiving people, promoting darkness, and attacking believers.
• Defeated by Christ — Jesus triumphed over them at the cross (Colossians 2:15), disarming their accusations and making their defeat public. Believers share in this victory (Ephesians 2:6; Romans 8:37), though spiritual warfare continues until Christ’s return.
• Not to Be Feared — Nothing, including these powers, can separate us from God’s love (Romans 8:38-39). The church’s existence proclaims God’s wisdom to them (Ephesians 3:10), and we stand firm in Christ’s armor (Ephesians 6:10-18).
In summary, principalities and powers represent supernatural spiritual authorities—often demonic rulers and forces in rebellion against God—whom Christ has already conquered. This underscores the reality of spiritual warfare, the supremacy of Jesus, and the believer’s security and calling to resist evil through faith, prayer, and the full armor of God. As a pastor, you might find this ties directly into themes of spiritual discernment, deliverance, and the cosmic victory of the gospel.
TPC Pastor's Page 